There is a disturbing trend in politics and lawmaking that has developed over the last 10 years – one which I think everyone really needs to take a long, hard look at.
Over the last 10 years there’s been a lot of noise made over “security” and “protecting” and the like. But if you look more closely at what has actually been done, you’ll see that largely the laws, policies, wars, agencies, etc., that have been put into place are not actually here to protect you.
Instead, these things which have been done in the name of “security” actually have a quite different aim – they are designed explicitly to protect the people who came up with the law/policy/etc., not the “people” at large. Instead, you are simply meant to feel secure, without actually being secure.
I like to call this sort of thing “CYA syndrome,” or “cover your ass syndrome.” Because that’s really all it is.
Let’s take a look at some of the many, many things that have been done in the last 10 years:
Creation of the Department of Homeland Security
- Supposed to: unify departments to increase information sharing so important information about legitimate threats are not missed
- Actually: creates a huge bureaucratic monstrosity that is less responsive than the previous individual agencies.
War in Iraq
- Supposed to: remove a highly dangerous dictator and get rid of a hiding place for terrorists
- Actually: removed a not-quite-as-dangerous dictator and created more hiding places for terrorists (and inspired many more people to become terrorists because of resentment)
REAL ID Act
- Supposed to: unify ID requirements across the country and make it impossible for anyone (not just terrorists) to get a fake ID, thus stopping them from ever being able to get on a plane, into a government building, etc.
- Actually: unified ID requirements across some of the country, at huge cost to the states themselves, made the whole process much, much more annoying and difficult for the 99.999% of normal people, did not stop people from getting on planes with nefarious intentions.
Increased Airport Security
- Supposed to: prevent another 9/11
- Actually: hassles the traveling public via scope creep (always adding more restrictions based on the last failed attempt, even if it had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11)
All of these things are not so much to achieve a goal in and of themselves (if they even can), but rather to give those in power something to point to in case everything goes wrong. “We did this,” they’ll say, “so you can’t blame me.” Or, alternatively, before anything has gone wrong, those in power can point at these things and say “see? I’m tough, I’m doing things.” This is related to something called the “politician’s fallacy,” which says:
- Something must be done.
- This is something.
- Therefore, we must do it.
This of course results in poorly thought out solutions for urgent problems – sound familiar?
But there’s no incentive to properly think out solutions for these kinds of problems. Fast answers and swift action are all that matter in our short-attention-span world; nevermind that they are often wrong or contrary to our long-term success.
What is particularly infuriating about this is that nobody* seems to realize that this is going on.
As we come up on the anniversary of 9/11, I hope that everyone will step back and take a good, long, hard look at what’s been going on these past years – because we’re way past due for one. We’ve had the wool pulled over our eyes for far too long.
* Well, a sufficient majority, anyway.