{"id":3156,"date":"2010-07-31T14:12:10","date_gmt":"2010-07-31T18:12:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/?p=3156"},"modified":"2010-07-31T14:12:10","modified_gmt":"2010-07-31T18:12:10","slug":"why-i-still-use-my-canon-powershot-s3-is-camera","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2010\/07\/31\/why-i-still-use-my-canon-powershot-s3-is-camera\/","title":{"rendered":"Why I Still Use My Canon PowerShot S3 IS Camera"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Considering how fast the digital camera world moves forward (in terms of technology), you might find it surprising that I – a huge <\/em>technology geek – am still using my 2006-vintage Canon PowerShot S3 IS<\/a> camera, even though it has been replaced by more than a few new models from Canon (at least 5 new models, by my count – and quite possibly more).<\/p>\n

Now you might be wondering why I’m sticking with an older camera like this – but I assure you, there is a very good reason. And that reason is, basically, that Canon has not come out with a newer, “better” camera that is comparable to the venerable S3 in terms of features, price, performance, and accessories.<\/p>\n

For example, the direct successor to the S3 is the S5, which is basically the same camera, but with 8 megapixels instead of 6, a newer image processor, and a hot shoe for attaching an auxiliary flash.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Sounds great, right? Well, yes and no. While at first glance the S5 seems like it is “better,” there is one other change that’s really <\/em>annoying – the memory card slot on the S5 is on the bottom of the camera, inside the battery compartment, instead of on the side like in the S3. This means that you can’t switch memory cards easily while on a tripod, since the battery compartment is usually blocked by your tripod mount. And while this seems like a minor nit-pick, you also have to consider that the other new features of the S5 just aren’t quite compelling enough to justify buying an entirely new camera<\/strong>. (Remember: these cameras aren’t cheap, and they don’t have the same resale value that a full DSLR would have.)<\/p>\n

There are more examples as well. Moving up the Canon “S” series of cameras we come to the SX10 and Sx20. Now, these are both very nice cameras, but again, they have some downsides that make it just not-quite-good-enough to justify spending a whole bunch of money on a new camera.<\/p>\n

One aspect of the new cameras in the “S” series is that the lens speed (i.e.<\/em>,largest aperture setting) has been slowly going down.\u00a0 My S3 has a max aperture of\u00a0 f\/2.7 at the wide end, and f\/3.5 at full zoom – but the SX10 and SX20 have max apertures of\u00a0 f\/2.8 at the wide end and f\/5.7 at full zoom.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>And things don’t get any better if you jump up to the next range of Canon cameras – the PowerShot G series. Oh, sure, the early G series cameras had decently fast lenses (f\/2.0 at the wide end, which is impressive for what is technically still a “point and shoot” camera), but the later G series all got bumped up to f\/2.8 at the wide end, which is… not as impressive.<\/p>\n

(For those who are a little confused as to what I’m talking about with these crazy f-numbers<\/a> and references to “fast” lenses, this article from Wikipedia <\/a>offers a good explanation. Generally speaking, a smaller f-number means a larger aperture<\/a>, which means more light can come into the camera in a given amount of time.)<\/p>\n

And let’s not forget that I’ve invested a fair bit of change into accessories for my camera. I’ve got filters<\/a> and wide-angle lens adapters<\/a>, which I would prefer not to have to re-buy with a new camera. Now, while the S5 would take the same accessories, but the SX10 and SX20 would not. And as for the G series, well, some of them support my accessories (mostly the earlier models) but some do not.<\/p>\n

And I’m still<\/em>\"\"<\/a> not done – because some of the models above have the nice swivel-screen that is so handy to have, but others don’t. And some have the same electronic viewfinder, but others have a rather simple see-through preview hole, which does not actually show you what your picture will look like (instead, you have to use the full-sized screen).<\/p>\n

I also am rather particular in my camera using regular AA-size batteries, so that I can find replacements easily in the field if I need to. Also, I can carry extra spares easily and charge them all using standard battery chargers, instead of needing special manufacturer-specific chargers.<\/p>\n

So, as you can see, while there are many newer cameras to choose from, none offers the same excellent mix of features and accessories as my venerable old S3:<\/p>\n