{"id":2744,"date":"2009-08-09T10:16:50","date_gmt":"2009-08-09T14:16:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/?p=2744"},"modified":"2009-08-09T10:16:50","modified_gmt":"2009-08-09T14:16:50","slug":"what-lord-of-the-flies-taught-us-about-free-markets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2009\/08\/09\/what-lord-of-the-flies-taught-us-about-free-markets\/","title":{"rendered":"What &#8220;The Lord of the Flies&#8221; Taught us about Free Markets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve often said that: Laws are only needed when you can&#8217;t trust people to do the &#8220;right thing.&#8221; Looking at another way, you could say that the honor system only works when you can trust everyone involved to be&#8230; well, honorable.<\/p>\n<p>Because of the simple facts of probability, as a population grows larger and larger, the probability of <em>everyone<\/em> being &#8220;honorable&#8221; decreases, until you reach a population size where it is 100% certain that some people will be dishonorable. At this stage, laws are required if you wish to retain any semblance of order.<\/p>\n<p>When people are left alone in a situation where there are no laws, no outside authority, chaos results &#8211; call it the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lord_of_the_Flies\">Lord of the Flies<\/a>&#8221; effect.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 240px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/okobojierik\/346158990\/\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" title=\"Wall Street Journal\" src=\"http:\/\/farm1.static.flickr.com\/123\/346158990_1ca071e203_m.jpg\" alt=\"Flickr image by Enrico Fuente\" width=\"240\" height=\"160\" \/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Flickr image by Enrico Fuente<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>This has ramifications for what is traditionally called the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Free_market\">free market<\/a>.&#8221; Remember that the entities involved in a &#8220;free market&#8221; are, if not people themselves, they are companies which are run by people (and are treated legally as people).<\/p>\n<p>The ideal &#8220;free market&#8221; is one &#8220;free&#8221; of any regulation &#8211; letting the market &#8220;regulate itself.&#8221; When you consider that the &#8220;market&#8221; is just people (acting through companies) &#8211; you realize that the &#8220;free market&#8221; approach is, essentially, leaving corporations (run by people) alone in a situation with little to no laws or regulation.<\/p>\n<p>Obviously, the idea of such a group &#8220;regulating itself&#8221; is absurd. The inevitable end result of such a system can only be chaos: a &#8220;Lord of the Flies&#8221; situation, but with companies instead of people. Brutal authority from the strongest, meanest, most vicious and largest. Innocent people &#8211; the ones who try to do the &#8220;right thing&#8221; are pushed aside and eventually killed.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Consider this carefully.<\/strong> This is a very disturbing consequence for those of us on the &#8220;outside&#8221; of the market, because we are effectively the &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Lord_of_the_Flies#Piggy\">Piggies<\/a>&#8221; in this situation.<\/p>\n<p>Traditionally we have tried to deal with this situation with laws &#8211; the rallying call of &#8220;<em>regulate! regulate! regulate!<\/em>&#8221; But laws have their own problems, which stem from deep, fundamental flaws with our classical lawmaking mechanism.<\/p>\n<p>The problems with laws are that <strong>laws reflect the culture of the lawmakers<\/strong>. (I don&#8217;t mean the &#8220;culture&#8221; in the larger sense of the people from which the lawmakers come, although that plays a factor. Instead, I refer to the <em>culture of lawmakers themselves<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/keithius\/3655619348\/in\/set-72157620417398566\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright\" title=\"Nice Side View of the capitol building\" src=\"http:\/\/farm4.static.flickr.com\/3367\/3655619348_8396961cd3_m.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"240\" height=\"180\" \/><\/a>In a society where lawmakers&#8217; primary vested interest is not the &#8220;rightness&#8221; of what they do, but rather their own welfare (in the form of being elected again), the resulting policy created will be one reflective of these values &#8211; short term solutions that only serve to get lawmakers elected again, rather than doing the &#8220;right thing.&#8221; Problems are pushed on the next generation, after the current generation (of lawmakers) is gone (term limits). The &#8220;planning horizon&#8221; of such a government is limited to the length of the terms of its constituent members. This creates a problem in that these term lengths are usually much less than the lifetime of the people who are governed. As a result, laws are short-sighted and ill-conceived &#8211; the &#8220;law of the week&#8221; effect.<\/p>\n<p>It would seem then that the challenges involved in solving the problems which afflict us are so deep-seated as to be unsurmountable. <em><strong>But I do not counsel despair!<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>We know the changes we would like to see, the behavior we would like to encourage &#8211; so the answer is to simply reward the behavior we want, and discourage (or punish) the behavior we don&#8217;t. This answer is so simple and obvious as to be almost laughable &#8211; but it has been proven to work, in more ways than you might realize.<\/p>\n<p>We often use these same techniques on our children &#8211; allowances for when chores are done and behavior is good, revoking privileges (TV, access to the car, computer time, etc.) when behavior is bad. We use similar techniques when training animals &#8211; reward desired behavior, punish (by way of revoking attention or treats) undesired behavior.<\/p>\n<p>These then are our possible solutions: to make lawmakers accountable to the laws they create long after they have left office. In democratic societies, perhaps to make the people who elected lawmakers accountable for the mistakes of the lawmakers after they have left office. In other words, make the primary motivating factor of the lawmaker not be their immediate re-election, but rather their long-term reputation; the long-term reputation of the laws they create.<\/p>\n<p>When we have done this, then we can give proper attention to the &#8220;markets&#8221; which seem to dominate so much of our society in this day and age, and make laws that are not just punitive, but thoughtful and deeply connected to encouraging good behavior in all respects.<\/p>\n<p>If we can do these things, we will have set up a situation where markets can truly be both &#8220;free&#8221; and &#8220;good&#8221; in that they will be encouraged to do the &#8220;right thing&#8221; always. Instead of enforcing arbitrary &#8220;thou shalt not&#8221; laws, we will have set up a system which by its very nature is conducive towards creating and maintaining a responsible, ethical, and fundamentally &#8220;good&#8221; market. I think that such a market will be infinitely better &#8211; and, arguably, <em>more free<\/em> than our current, so-called &#8220;free market.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Taking the lessons of the book &#8220;The Lord of the Flies&#8221; and applying them to the so-called &#8220;Free Market.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"webmentions_disabled_pings":false,"webmentions_disabled":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":3,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[199,17],"tags":[19,226,225,392],"class_list":["post-2744","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-my-opinion","category-society","tag-government","tag-laws","tag-markets","tag-society","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pimUj-Ig","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6390,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2025\/05\/28\/no-more-the-way-things-were\/","url_meta":{"origin":2744,"position":0},"title":"No More &#8220;The Way Things Were&#8221;","author":"Keith Survell","date":"May 28, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"There is no changing the fact that all of this has happened. Once you step into lawlessness, there is no quick fix, no \"oops, sorry.\" There is only a long, slow path to rebuilding a trust that is now lost... and the sooner we start, the less time it will\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"politics","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1007,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2007\/12\/11\/applying-old-laws-to-new-technology\/","url_meta":{"origin":2744,"position":1},"title":"Applying Old Laws to New Technology","author":"Keith Survell","date":"December 11, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"You've probably heard of the RIAA and the MPAA (the Recording Industry Association of America and the Motion Picture Association of America, respectively) before. They've been in the news a lot lately \u2013 suing old people who don't have a computer for sharing mp3 files on the Internet and so\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;society&quot;","block_context":{"text":"society","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/society\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1462,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2008\/11\/03\/a-programmers-perspective-on-politics\/","url_meta":{"origin":2744,"position":2},"title":"A Programmer&#8217;s Perspective on Politics","author":"Keith Survell","date":"November 3, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Election time always finds me musing on the nature of politics. Of course I must admit that being a computer programmer colors my view of the whole process more than just a little bit. I mean, I know that the political process in this country is one that has evolved\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"politics","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Image courtesty Flikr user umjanedoan","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-content\/uploads\/\/2008\/11\/really-old-law-books.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":4368,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2013\/06\/09\/not-ready-to-be-a-surveillance-state\/","url_meta":{"origin":2744,"position":3},"title":"We&#8217;re Not Ready to be a Surveillance State","author":"Keith Survell","date":"June 9, 2013","format":false,"excerpt":"Recent news has revealed what many already suspected - we have become a de-facto surveillance state. The problem is: we are not at all ready to be a surveillance state.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;My Opinion&quot;","block_context":{"text":"My Opinion","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/personal\/my-opinion\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"1984 was not supposed to be an instruction manual for a surveillance state","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-content\/uploads\/\/2008\/05\/1984-was-not-supposed-to-be-an-instruction-manual-300x225.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":6280,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2025\/02\/11\/oathbreaker\/","url_meta":{"origin":2744,"position":4},"title":"Oathbreaker","author":"Keith Survell","date":"February 11, 2025","format":false,"excerpt":"Talking about sworn oaths and the people who break them.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"politics","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":417,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2005\/02\/15\/can-the-law-regulate-reckless-sex\/","url_meta":{"origin":2744,"position":5},"title":"Can the law regulate reckless sex?","author":"Keith Survell","date":"February 15, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"This is so ridiculous... what more can I say? People arguing for LAWS to PUNISH people for having unprotected sex - but only if it's their first time!","rel":"","context":"In &quot;politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"politics","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2744"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2744\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}