{"id":1299,"date":"2008-08-19T20:39:01","date_gmt":"2008-08-20T00:39:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/?p=1299"},"modified":"2008-08-19T20:39:01","modified_gmt":"2008-08-20T00:39:01","slug":"wheres-the-stick-shift-gone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2008\/08\/19\/wheres-the-stick-shift-gone\/","title":{"rendered":"Where&#8217;s the Stick Shift Gone?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s time to revisit a popular topic around here &#8211; the old &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2005\/01\/30\/manual-vs-automatic\/\">manual vs. automatic<\/a>&#8221; argument.<\/p>\n<p>If you follow &#8211; well, actually, let&#8217;s just be honest here and say &#8220;obsess&#8221; &#8211; over cars, you might have noticed a trend in regards to what transmissions are available on new cars these days. And that trend is that traditional, &#8220;proper&#8221; manual transmissions are increasingly rare &#8211; especially in bigger, sportier cars. (Think: BMW, Audi, etc.)<\/p>\n<p>(Just to be clear, I&#8217;m not going to talk about &#8220;luxury&#8221; cars here &#8211; those have almost always been exclusively automatic, and with good reason, so let&#8217;s just cut them out of the discussion for now, OK?)<\/p>\n<p>What seems to be replacing our beloved manual transmission these days is something that the folks on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bbc.co.uk\/topgear\">Top Gear<\/a> call a &#8220;flappy-paddle gearbox.&#8221; You&#8217;ve probably seen them in car ads by now &#8211; those little, well, &#8220;flappy&#8221; paddles on the steering wheel (or the steering column, if the car is badly designed) that change gears for you. Once only exclusively found on super-expensive &#8220;supercars,&#8221; you can now find them on things like the Mitsubishi Lancer (or the new Outlander &#8211; alas!).<\/p>\n<p>I have mixed feelings about these sorts of transmissions &#8211; not the least of which is because the presence of the paddles says <strong>absolutely nothing <\/strong>about what type of transmission is really &#8220;under the hood.&#8221; And that seems kind of&#8230; gimmicky to me.<\/p>\n<p>It is worth noting that paddle shifters originally came from the world of high-speed racing &#8211; when you&#8217;re going 300 MPH and the next driver is 3 inches from your bumper, taking your hand off the wheel to shift can be&#8230; problematic. When you&#8217;re shifting gears while trying to find a parking space at your local shopping mall it&#8217;s&#8230; less so. (I&#8217;ve heard that paddle shifters, although arguably cool and good for racing on a track, are less than optimal for &#8220;around-town&#8221; type driving &#8211; and can in fact be quite infuriating in those instances!)<\/p>\n<p>To further muddle things, paddle shifters <em>might <\/em>be connected to a normal automatic gearbox, and <em>might <\/em>function the same way as the &#8220;manu-matic&#8221; or &#8220;sport-tronic&#8221; transmissions that were so popular for a time. The only difference is that instead of shifting the gear lever into a little &#8220;gate&#8221; and pushing it up or down to change gears, you do it instead with the little paddles on the steering wheel.<\/p>\n<p><em>On the other hand<\/em>, those paddle shifters might be connected to a very crazy thing sometimes called a &#8220;clutchless manual transmission.&#8221; This is <em>almost<\/em> exactly what it sounds like &#8211; a manual transmission that just doesn&#8217;t have a clutch&#8230; or, well, a clutch <em>pedal<\/em>, anyway. Internally there is (usually) still a real clutch, which is controlled by the car&#8217;s computer, but otherwise it functions just like a normal manual transmission (in theory, anyway).<\/p>\n<p>As you&#8217;d expect, these fancy transmissions are (generally) only found on very expensive cars. They may very well be &#8220;the way of the future, &#8221; but I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;re here yet, and I don&#8217;t think they will be for some time. These sorts of systems are <strong>quite complex<\/strong>, which of course is just a fancy way of saying they have <strong>lots of ways to break down<\/strong>. And aside from fact that the car&#8217;s computer is capable of shifting gears much faster and very much more consistently, there&#8217;s really no advantage to it. I mean, if you&#8217;re going to have all that mechanical, technical, and electronic hoo-ha, why not just&#8230; get an automatic? Or, better still, just get a traditional manual?<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps it&#8217;s because many cars with these sorts of systems are &#8211; well, let&#8217;s be honest, quite expensive, or at least more &#8220;status symbol&#8221; than &#8220;mode of transportation.&#8221; Rather than being for practical purposes, these fancy new transmissions are really just there for show, or at least so that the 60-year old retired CEO or whatever who&#8217;s driving the car (with the arthritic leg) can still drive like an idiot (and talk on his &#8211; or her, to be fair &#8211; cell phone, no doubt) in a $100,000+ car without having to dilly-dally with all the bother of <em>actually controlling the gear change in the car.<\/em> Because that would be too much like&#8230; &#8220;driving.&#8221; But I digress.<\/p>\n<p>Automatic transmissions <em>are<\/em> getting much better these days &#8211; but until there is a deep, fundamental change in the method that automatic transmissions use to change gear ratios for the car&#8217;s drive train, they are still going to have the same fundamental drawbacks (more or less) &#8211; sluggish gear changes, less efficiency, and greater costs. Obviously, some automatic transmissions will be better than others on any of these things, but they&#8217;ll all suffer them, to a greater or lesser degree.<\/p>\n<p>There is one bright ray of hope, however! With gasoline prices going up like they are, smaller cars &#8211; especially fuel-efficient 4-cylinder cars &#8211; are becoming quite popular again. And there&#8217;s no doubt about it &#8211; a manual transmission allows you to make the best use of a smaller, weaker engine. So there&#8217;s some good news. Of course, on the other hand, for <em>ultimate<\/em> fuel efficiency, car makers are turning more and more to something called <strong>CVT<\/strong> &#8211; that&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Continuously_variable_transmission\">Continously Variable Transmission<\/a>, in case you were wondering. This is actually a really exciting technology &#8211; no more gears, just a continous, practically &#8220;infinite&#8221; range of drive ratios, automatically selectable without any disconnection of the car&#8217;s drive train. (The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Continuously_variable_transmission\">Wikipedia article<\/a> I&#8217;ve linked to is particularly instructive.)<\/p>\n<p>The downside, of course, is that current technology limits the amount of power (torque, in particular) that can be sent through a CVT &#8211; making it generally only acceptable for smaller, lower-power cars. And lots of people find the lack of &#8220;lurch&#8221; &#8211; as in when the gears change (automatic or manual) &#8211; disconcerning, so some manufacturers actually take steps to make the car still &#8220;lurch&#8221; preceptively at intervals. Weird, I know. But of course as in all things, technology will improve &#8211; so maybe in the future we&#8217;ll all be driving cars with CVTs? (Assuming we&#8217;re not driving &#8220;flying&#8221; cars&#8230; I&#8217;m waiting for that day, but I won&#8217;t hold my breath.)<\/p>\n<p>So what&#8217;s a tripedalist to do? Well, I think it is safe to say that the stick shift will never <strong>completely<\/strong> dissapear &#8211; after all, there will always be a place for a simple, efficient, manual transmission in cars of many different types (sports cars, small cars, and certain types of big trucks). But things like &#8220;flappy paddle&#8221; shifters are more likely to show up &#8211; and to be the only available option &#8211; on more and more cars. So the best thing we can do is vote with our wallets &#8211; if you like driving a stick shift (and why wouldn&#8217;t you?), buy a stick shift, even if it&#8217;s not quite the car you&#8217;d like. (Or use your own discretion &#8211; after all, you&#8217;re the one driving it!)<\/p>\n<p>If you&#8217;re one of those people who&#8217;s not lamenting the gradual dissapearance of the stick shift in today&#8217;s cars, well, I guess you can break out the cake and celebrate. If a car to you is just a &#8220;thing&#8221; to get you from point A to point B, where there&#8217;s a lot of traffic in between (or long stretches of open highway with no curves\/stops), all I can say is&#8230; enjoy your automatic.<\/p>\n<p>As for me &#8211; I&#8217;ll be driving stick, and I&#8217;ll be quite happy with it, thank you very much! <strong>Long live the stick shift!<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It&#8217;s time to revisit a popular topic around here &#8211; the old &#8220;manual vs. automatic&#8221; argument. If you follow &#8211; well, actually, let&#8217;s just be honest here and say &#8220;obsess&#8221; &#8211; over cars, you might have noticed a trend in regards to what transmissions are available on new cars these days. And that trend is&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2008\/08\/19\/wheres-the-stick-shift-gone\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Where&#8217;s the Stick Shift Gone?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"webmentions_disabled_pings":false,"webmentions_disabled":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"activitypub_content_warning":"","activitypub_content_visibility":"","activitypub_max_image_attachments":3,"activitypub_interaction_policy_quote":"anyone","activitypub_status":"","footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[9],"tags":[81,100],"class_list":["post-1299","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cars-and-trucks","tag-driving","tag-opinion","entry"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pimUj-kX","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":362,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2005\/01\/30\/manual-vs-automatic\/","url_meta":{"origin":1299,"position":0},"title":"Manual vs. Automatic","author":"Keith Survell","date":"January 30, 2005","format":false,"excerpt":"A while back I read a couple of editorials over at The Truth About Cars regarding the \"Death of the Stick Shift.\" This got me quite worked up, so here's my response.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cars and Trucks&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cars and Trucks","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/cars-and-trucks\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":880,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2007\/05\/06\/i-miss-my-stick-shift\/","url_meta":{"origin":1299,"position":1},"title":"I Miss my Stick Shift","author":"Keith Survell","date":"May 6, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"I miss my stick shift, I really do. And this is why.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cars and Trucks&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cars and Trucks","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/cars-and-trucks\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":1536,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2008\/12\/08\/why-the-stick-shift\/","url_meta":{"origin":1299,"position":2},"title":"Why the Stick Shift?","author":"Keith Survell","date":"December 8, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Quite a few people who have read my Manual vs. Automatic article have wondered why anyone in their right mind would still use, drive, or even want a manual (stick shift) transmission in this day and age. They just don't understand - after all, modern automatics are so much better\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cars and Trucks&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cars and Trucks","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/cars-and-trucks\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":3064,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2010\/04\/23\/behind-the-wheel-2010-volkswagen-beetle\/","url_meta":{"origin":1299,"position":3},"title":"Behind the Wheel: 2010 Volkswagen Beetle","author":"Keith Survell","date":"April 23, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"The venerable old Keithmobile-D was in the shop recently for some long-overdue repairs, which means I needed to rent a car for a few days. This time, the rental agency set me up with a brand-spankin' new black 2010 Volkswagen New Beetle - and of course, as I do with\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cars and Trucks&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cars and Trucks","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/cars-and-trucks\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":4700,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2015\/06\/22\/behind-the-wheel-my-mid-80s-k-cars\/","url_meta":{"origin":1299,"position":4},"title":"Behind the Wheel: My Mid-80&#8217;s K-Cars","author":"Keith Survell","date":"June 22, 2015","format":false,"excerpt":"My first 3 cars were all mid-80's K-Cars, and since they were all so similar I figured I'd just lump them into a single review rather than try and do them individually. 1985 Plymouth Reliant This was my very first car, and though I only had it about 2 weeks,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cars and Trucks&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cars and Trucks","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/cars-and-trucks\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"1985 plymouth reliant","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-content\/uploads\/\/2015\/06\/1985-plymouth-reliant-300x225.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":3192,"url":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/2010\/10\/26\/behind-the-wheel-2010-dodge-charger\/","url_meta":{"origin":1299,"position":5},"title":"Behind the Wheel: 2010 Dodge Charger","author":"Keith Survell","date":"October 26, 2010","format":false,"excerpt":"Keith finally gets his wish and spends some time behind the wheel of a 2010 Dodge Charger!","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Cars and Trucks&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Cars and Trucks","link":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/category\/cars-and-trucks\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1299","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1299"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1299\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1299"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1299"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.starkeith.net\/coredump\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1299"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}