Tradeoffs, Self-Insurance, and Externalities:

I ran across this very interesting post over at The Volokh Conspiracy. It talks about SUVs and self-insurance versus social-insurance. From the article:

The point is more general. Every time it snows, I can get around in my SUV (that’s one of the many reasons we bought an SUV in our family). Those hybrid drivers out there, by contrast, can’t move until the streets get plowed. Yet the snow plows are paid for my tax dollars as well as theirs. Again, whereas I have self-insured against snow and internalized my costs of getting to work, the hybrid driver has again decided to externalize the costs of his choice by forcing me to pay for the snow plows that he needs and I don’t. Again, policy conclusion: Mandate that every household own an SUV.

Sort of brings things into focus, doesn’t it? Now, you can hate people who drive SUVs; but trying to “ban” SUVs strictly on an environmental basis is clearly wrong. The picture is bigger than that.

Related posts:

  1. The Quixotic Quest for Invulnerability Schneier on Security: Homeland Security Cost-Benefit Analysis. A very worthwhile...
  2. Don’t Steal the Focus Jeff Atwood made a wonderful post the other day called...
  3. Fun in the Snow Okay, I admit it, I'm a sucker for snow -...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WP Hashcash


Using Internet Explorer is risky. Click here to upgrade to Firefox, the world's safest web browser for free.